“Syringe Distribution Programs Can Improve Public Health During the Opioid Overdose Crisis”

An article published by Pew Charitable Trusts informs individuals of the purpose for syringe services programs (SSPs) through a multifaceted analysis of trends in public health. The article accentuates the need for SSPs, as such programs advocate for harm reduction strategies, reduce stigmatization, and incentivize individuals experiencing substance use disorders to reach out for supportive treatment. Pew’s article investigates the toxicity of misinformation and stigmatization: State legislatures fail to correlate increasing rates of infectious diseases and overdoses with unsterile syringe practices, especially as access to prescribed opioids becomes more restrictive and illicit opioids become more prevalent. The article is a great source for policymakers to understand the merit and necessity of SSPs operations, including how these programs are safely and effectively established.


To read the full article, click here.

“If Lawmakers Really Want to Follow the Science They Will Repeal Codified Opioid Guidelines”

Jeffrey A. Singer’s article, published by CATO Institute, reveals recent evidence of the reluctance of lawmakers to adhere to the science behind medication-based treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) across the country, correlating to rises in overdose death rates. This article is a critique on codified barriers implemented by policymakers, from restrictions in dosing within Medicare and Medicaid to the perpetuation of stigma that coincides with substance use disorders as a byproduct of refuting science. Singer’s critique is exposing a need for policymakers to face the facts, trust the science, and advocate for our communities.

To read the full article, click here.